


I know lots of recruiters who enjoy great value from a Recruiter Pro account (which costs anything from £4k to £8k per license, per year) and I can see some benefits. You still can, but by adding this extra obstacle, I believe that a free account just became too much hard work if you really want to use LinkedIn as a hiring tool. This move is smart business as up until now you could do everything you needed to do on a free account. Early last year, LinkedIn started hiding the full surname and this appears to be just another step in reducing the value of a free account. It’s not that I have a problem paying for a tool, I just won’t pay for premium features that I don’t need and I won’t pay an extraordinary premium for features that do not provide an extraordinary benefit.Ģ weeks ago, LinkedIn rolled out a change to their database that effectively hides the entire profile of someone in your 3rd degreee network (and we in Social Talent have heard about instances where 2nd degree connection data is also hidden). I do have a problem, however, with how they price their product and how they fall short of telling their own customers how best to use the system. It has changed the face of the recruitment industry and every single recruiter I know uses it, and rightly so. Let me state on the record that I really like LinkedIn’s product. A lot changes in social media in 3 weeks! The MD of the company was curious as I had recommended to his Dublin team that they would be fine to continue using Free accounts.

I had trained their Dublin office three weeks previous and a question was raised when I recommended that they should all consider paying for Business accounts (these cost UK£12.95 per month) on LinkedIn. Last week I trained a team of agency recruiters in Cork.
